566. * inernet phycologstsFrom: "topaz Tur" <topazt1@gmail.com> Subject: visitor angry Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:41:35 +1000 Who wrote his persuasive techniques, Sure the first few are fineBut as it gets deeped and deeper its complete nonsense I would know i am an inernet phycologsts. I would think you would reread your work some passages are a no go area total slapping session....What human being says nah uh Anyone who follows this techniques will clearly end up with no friends and some definite slapping scars. Please re do this work. The internet doesnt need this neither do you Sincerely a conscerned internet user. From: The Rink <sam@rinkworks.com> Subject: Re: visitor angry Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:16:52 -0400 Our whole "How To Be Persuasive" article (along with its companions, "How To Be Funny" and "How To Be Romantic") is a work of humor. The whole *point* is that none of the advice given in them is any good at all. Not even the first few points, although you are correct that the advice gets more and more outrageous as the article progresses. That's the principle of comic escalation at work. -- Sam. P.S.: What's an inernet phycologsts? If you mean internet psychologist, how does that work? Do your patients have to lie on their own sofas, or do you have a virtual sofa in a chat room somewhere? To: "The Rink" <sam@rinkworks.com> Subject: Re: visitor angry Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:03:44 +1100 HAHA. Oh wow. I feel dumbfounded. Sorry about the last email. Cheers. While the word "dumbfounded" is not entirely inappropriate here, I still wonder if he knows what it means. |
|
Stupid Emails