> > > > Hmmm. Peach anything is pretty tasty. Jolly Ranchers, for instance. But a strange thing is happening here. Call me nutty, but (not "NuttyButt") these crazy-wrapped blue raspberry DumDums are starting to tickle me! Do you think the blue tongue I get from them undermines my credibility at the lawyer's office I work at?
> > >
> > > Your honor, Prosecution's blue tounge directly affects his/her ability to represent his/her client.
> > >
> > > Don't know... sounds like it could be pretty serious to me.
> > >
> > > Drac "New meaning to Blue's Clues" imas
> >
> > Your Honor, I must object to the Defense's characterization of my blue tongue. Were I a vole, having a blue tongue would be my normal state of being. Were I a boo-bie, having blue feet would be my normal state of being. I submit that a ruling by this Court that my blue tongue impairs in any way my ability to represent my client would be at the least prejudicial and non-politically correct, certainly in terms of animal rights. I ask the court to reject Defense counsel's argument.
> >
> > Mou"I'm not even an attorney and I'm way too good at this"sie
> >
> > *had to add the dash because the badwordfinder didn't like it without
>
> Your honorable Sam-ness, we await your ruling.

Your Honour, the record shows that Prosecution has shown bad faith by wilfully engaging in a false analogy between the species. Plaintiff's Counsel is clearly not an animal, neither bird nor beast. The question of animal rights does not apply: Counsel is a human being. It is trifling to consider blue tongues in humans as status quo. De minimis non curat lex. I ask the Court to fittingly reject Prosecution Counsel's argument.

Wolfspirit,
Ll.b. perperam