| 
 Re: James Bond movies and their affect on the universe. 
 Quartz, on host 63.64.161.72
  Saturday, February 3, 2001, at 12:57:47
  Re: James Bond movies and their affect on the universe. posted by Jessica on Saturday, February 3, 2001, at 12:45:13:
> Heheh....a kindred spirit when it comes to Bond films, at last!  I got really into Bond last year.  You're the only person who I know who agrees with my Bond opinions!  Sean COnnery always seemed too arrogant, which may be Bond's personality, but I wasn't charmed. Roger Moore is much nicer and more attractive.  But yeah Pierce is the best--he's the best-lookin', and he's very  rico suave.   Timothy Dalton looks like his face is molded from clay.   > > The guy who was in one movie was a good transition from Connery to Moore.  In his movie, Bond falls in love, gets married, and his wife gets snuffed by a baddie.  So Moore's Bond is a more sensitive Bond than Connery, having had his heart broken (sigh!). > > When I lived in London, I was a few miles from Pinewood Studios, where the Bond films were made.  My boyfriend's brother worked there, so I got a tour.  He told me he once saw Sean Connery, and that he looked like an old man in person.  Which makes sense.  > > --Jez"Ivana Peelemov, Colorado secret agent"zika > >    
  The funny thing is (and I mean funny ODD), is that I'm not even into James Bond THAT much. I love spy movies but not James Bond movies, for some reason. View To A Kill is good though.
  Quartz, Agent 005 and Jedi Knight. And I'm a WRITER, too! ~~*Q*~~ 
 |