| Re: Regarding Equestrian in the Olympics...Wolfspirit, on host 206.47.244.93 Thursday, September 28, 2000, at 09:29:18
 Re: Regarding Chess in the Olympics... posted by Brunnen-G on Tuesday, September 26, 2000, at 15:47:20:
 > > > This is worse than the inclusion of equestrian events.> >
 > > Hrm?  Watch out, or I'll sick Leen on you.  Equestrian events are absolutely fitting.  Few people realize it, but horseback riding is a physically taxing activity and requires precise physical coordination and timing.  It's as appropriate as any traditional Olympic sport.
 
 Equestrian events are even more traditional than most events, they having been a part of the Olympics for the last 2700 years or so.  I believe chariot races, and naked bareback trick pony stunt-double horse racing were the first big crowd pleasers in the Olympics. :-)
 
 
 > That comment surprised me as much as if someone had said "it's worse than the inclusion of swimming." [...] If you think the horse does everything itself and the rider just sits there, then anybody off the street could buy an appropriately-trained horse and win a gold medal at the Olympics. That's no more true than saying I could win an Olympic road race tomorrow if I only had the same kind of bike they use.
 >
 > Brunnen-"I wish"G
 
 Horse racing and off-road racing are certainly physical but they don't push the limits nearly enough.  Nah, my personal vote would be for the death-defying exploits of "WWII-style Olympic Dogfighting" performed in Sopwith Camel biplanes using PAINTBALL.  Now *there's* an event I'd like to see.
 
 Wolf "I wish!" spirit
 |